Home/Product/Portfolio

Portfolio management Firm & Enterprise

Which engagement is actually in trouble.

Running one implementation is a delivery problem. Running six is a different one, and opening six projects in turn to answer it is how a practice finds out about a slipping go-live in week nine instead of week three.

Portfolio dashboard

The view a principal needs, not the one a delivery lead needs.

The project dashboard answers "how is this engagement going". The portfolio dashboard answers a different question: of everything we are running, what needs me today.

Portfolio — LP Professional Services · 6 active engagements
Active engagements6
Below readiness threshold2
Open gates, all projects11
Unstaffed hours486
Engagements by readiness
Acme Mfg
78
Northwind
94
Kestrel Foods
61
Halstead
88
Bryce Group
91
Orlin Ltd
83
Two engagements sit under the 80% threshold. Kestrel Foods is four weeks from its planned go-live date.

What rolls up

The same numbers, summed across the book of work.

Nothing new to maintain. Every figure here already exists on the individual projects — the portfolio view just stops you opening six tabs to assemble it by hand.

Readiness, compared

Every engagement's weighted score against the same threshold, so "which go-live is at risk" is a glance rather than a meeting. Scores computed the same way on every project is what makes the comparison mean anything.

Open gates, everywhere

Unsigned phase sign-offs counted across the whole portfolio, with the engagement and the owner against each. Gate discipline stops depending on whoever remembers to chase.

Demand across engagements

A consultant allocated to three projects is over-committed in a way no single project can see. Portfolio capacity sums the demand and names the people who are past their capacity.

P1 defects and live risks

Open P1s and high-impact, high-probability risks across every client, so the weekly practice review starts from a list rather than from memory.

Migration reconciliation status

How many objects are still short of reconciled, per engagement. The number that most reliably predicts a bad cutover, tracked across all of them.

Unowned handovers

Critical responsibilities with no named successor, across every engagement including closed ones. This is where a practice discovers it is still running a client's month-end for free.

The practice problem

Six projects, one of them lying to you.

Every engagement reports itself as fine until it is not. The one in trouble is rarely the one being discussed, because the delivery lead closest to it is the person least able to see it from the outside.

A portfolio view does not fix that by adding reporting. It fixes it by making the same three numbers comparable across engagements — readiness against threshold, open gates, unstaffed hours — so the outlier is visible without anyone having to raise it.

The reason it works here is that every project runs the same method. Comparing readiness scores between two engagements only means something when both were scored against the same criteria, with the same weights, by the same rules.

This is what the seeded method buys you at practice scale. Firms that let every consultant build their own plan cannot compare engagements, because there is nothing common to compare. Load your method once, run every project from it, and the portfolio view becomes possible as a side effect. Loading your own method →

Included with Firm and Enterprise

Portfolio management and portfolio dashboards come with the Firm plan, alongside cloud projects and shared editing. Solo and Practice run projects individually.

See the plans

See your whole book of work at once.

Bring two live engagements and look at them side by side.